Advertising Law Series #5 – Are all comparative advertisements defamatory?

The case of Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Unilever Ltd., decided by the High Court of Delhi ruled upon the ‘multiple meaning rule’ in relation to a comparative advertisement.

In this Case Crunch, we provide a quick overview of the case and the key observations of the High Court of Delhi.

Learn more about our Technology and Entertainment Law practice.

#CaseCrunch #HindustanUnilever #Advertisment #GameChangerLawAdvisors

Please feel free to share your feedback about this Case Crunch with Srikanth Bhaskar (srikanth@gamechangerlaw.com).

 

Disclaimer

As per rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the “I agree” button below and accessing this website, the User acknowledges that by accessing this website (www.gamechangerlaw.com):