CaseCrunch

In this infographic, Srikanth explains a recent ruling of the NCLAT in the case of MAIF Investments India Pvt. Ltd v. Ind-Barath Power ltd & Ors, wherein the NCLAT upheld the enforceability of reserved matters in investment agreements.

In this Case Crunch, we provide a quick overview of the case and the key observations of the High Court of Bombay in the case of Gujarat Co-Op Milk Marketing Federation V. Hindustan Unilever Ltd on the subject of disparaging advertisements.

In this Case Crunch, we provide a quick overview of the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Horlicks Ltd. v Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. on the question of disparagement in advertisements. 

In this Case Crunch, we provide a quick analysis of the of the landmark decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Havells India v. Amritanshu Khaitan and Ors. on the question of 'honest' advertisements. 

In this Case Crunch, we provide a quick overview of the case and the key observations of the High Court of Delhi in the case of Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited Vs. Hindustan Unilever Limited on the subject of defamatory advertisements.

In this Case Crunch, we provide a quick overview of the case and the key observations of the High Court of Delhi in the case of Dabur India Ltd. vs Colortek Meghlaya (P) Ltd. on the subject of disparaging advertisments.

In this Case Crunch, we provide a quick overview of the case and key observations of the Supreme Court in recognising ICAAN and UDNDR.

Through this new series, we break down judgments that talk about how domain names are protected under the Indian trademark law. In this post, we take a look at the case of Yahoo! Inc. v. Akash Arora decided by the Delhi High Court. In what was possibly the first case of 'cyber-squatting' in the country, the Delhi High Court held that domain names serve the same function as a trademark and are thus, entitled to equal protection under the trademark law.

Continuing with our #casecrunch series on landmark judgments that shaped copyright law in 2018, in this post we discuss the case of B.N. Firos v. State of Kerala and Ors. The Supreme Court, in this case, held that governments can declare any 'government work', as understood within the meaning of Copyright Act, 1957, to be a 'protected system' under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

In this post, we discuss the case of Randhiraj Thakur vs. Jindal Saxena Financial Services Pvt Ltd, where the NCLAT restricted the applicability of the IBC to only those entities that have been expressly mentioned in the IBC.

Through this new series, we break down landmark judgments that shaped copyright law in 2018. In this post, we take a look at the case of Navigators Logistics Ltd. v. Kashif Qureshi & Ors. where the Delhi High Court held that there can be no copyright in the client list of employers.

Through this new series, we break down landmark judgments that shaped the IBC in 2018. In this post, we take a look at the case of SBI vs. V.Ramakrishnan where the Supreme Court held that moratoriums will not be applicable for personal guarantees

Viraj Joshi and Pranav Chinnaswamy break down the recently adjudicated decision in Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd v. G+H Schallschutz, wherein the Delhi High Court held that a contract will not be frustrated if the parties agree that a Force Majeure clause shall not operate in certain circumstances

Mahit Anand breaks down the recently adjudicated upon A2Z Infraservices Ltd v Union of India case, wherein contractual "price variation" and minimum wage is discussed.

In this edition of #CaseCrunch, Priya Sampath explores the "well-known trademarks" principle discussed in the landmark Ferrero Rocher case.

On this edition of #CaseCrunch, Viraj Joshi takes a look into the applicability of GST on liquidated damages i.e. pre-determined amount of damages to be paid in the event of breach of contract.

#CaseCrunch is back! Priya Sampath breaks down one of the most talked about and bizzare copyright cases in recent memory through an infographic.

In the third post in our Case Crunch series, Namrata Bhagwatula explains the importance of the latest NCLAT judgment in the matter of the insolvency of Veesons Energy Systems Private Limited

In the second edition of #CaseCrunch, Priya Sampath analyzes three key highlights of the recent Madras High Court judgment M/S Lyca Productions v. J. Manimaran through an infographic.

Case Crunch is our attempt at presenting summaries of landmark judgments of different courts in the form of short, snappy infographics. In this the first infographic, Namrata Bhagwatula breaks down the Daiichi-Malvinder Singh dispute and presents 3 key takeaways from the Delhi High Court judgment.